|
Phillip
Henry Christopher
MySpace
Phillip
Henry Christopher spent his childhood in Paris, France, Biloxi, Mississippi, and
the Green Mountain State of Vermont before landing in Coatesville, Pennsylvania,
where he grew in the smokestack shadows of blue collar America. Since then, he
has been a news reporter, industrial mechanic, taxi driver, karate sensei,
political activist, educator, reggae singer and mambo orchestra leader.
He has published in The Caribbean Writer, Gargoyle, New York Quarterly,
Lullwater Review, The Haight Ashbury Literary Review, The Argotist Online,
Blazevox, Perigee, Slow Trains, Blue Collar Review, Indented Pillow, Melic
Review, True Poet Magazine and Cokefish. His most recent writing,
including the novel-in-progress, Steeltown Dream can be found on the web here.
When not occupied with basic survival, or trying to find a publisher for one of
his novels, Christopher is arranging and recording new music for his next sonic
adventure, which he terms "psychedelic son-ska mambo reggae", a
sometimes joyous, sometimes disturbing, always quixotic blend of Cuban,
Jamaican, African and American musical influences, all sounding as if performed
by and for someone with drastically altered consciousness. That said, it should
be noted that Christopher, known musically as "Philadelphia Phil",
doesn't indulge in psychoactive recreations. (He's just creatively, and
permanently wired that way.) His latest music can be heard here.
Q:
Do you think of your lyrics as poetry?
A: In the broadest sense, song lyric and poetry are the same. They
originate from similar intention to self-conscious self-expression, share the
mechanics of meter and syllabic stress, and can apply the same literary devices.
They may also differ significantly. Simple declaration is not often perceived as
poetry, yet is often accepted as credible song lyric. In this respect, my own
work strives to accomplish lyric that can sustain itself with or without a
musical context. I confess I am not always very successful in this ambition.
Q: Do you think it is important that songs rhyme and if so why?
A: No, there is no absolute regarding song lyric and rhyme. That said, it
is certainly easier in many ways to rhyme lyrics. Our ears are accustomed to
recurrent cycles in music. Rhyming constructions might be a linguistic parallel
to predictable musical movements.
Q: Do you think song lyrics must conform to recognised song structures
such as clear rhyming schemes, choruses, refrains, hooks and bridges or that
songs can also be like free verse?
A: Songs can be free verse. Making it work is the challenge. Choruses,
refrains and rhyme schemes are conveniences. As such, they are functional and
useful, but certainly not absolutely necessary for song lyric. Most music is
highly structured. Entirely free verse, verse in which structure is more
difficult to identify, might suggest the need to operate in a freer musical
context, one in which oblique structure mirrors and complements the same in
associated language.
Q: When you read poetry in school or elsewhere did you recognize any
connection to the music you enjoyed?
A: Yes, though my own early education presented musical lyric and poetry
in segregated environments. Despite this, my best recollection is that I came
fairly early on to hear music in verse, and verse in lyric. Some popular music
of the period reflected the intention by songwriters to explore nuanced lyric,
to apply metaphor liberally, and to experiment with song and verse structures
also.
Q: Was there anything about poetry in books that influenced your
songwriting?
A: Before becoming fully engaged in music I read and wrote rhyming poems
and a great deal of free verse. It would be impossible to ignore the influence
of poetry on the songwriting I undertook some years later.
Q: Why do you think songs are more popular with people than poetry is?
A: There are probably many reasons for the enduring popularity of song,
even when poetry as a solitary reader's pleasure seems to be waning. I think the
distinction itself may be somewhat of a contemporary fiction. In past centuries,
in most cultures, poetry and music have never been entirely distinct, even at
times perceived as the same; spoken, sung, a capella or accompanied seen as both
poetry and music. Considering that, those expressions which we tend to call
"songs" benefit from those fundamental visceral elements which sound,
harmony, melody and rhythm bring to the experience of language.
Able as I am to address mostly the question in the English-speaking world, I do
have to wonder if the unpopularity of poetry is incidental to declining reading
by an entire generation. (In the U.S., nearly 40% of college students have not
read a book for pleasure in the last 12 months. Today's entering freshman
students have significantly smaller vocabularies than the past generation. The
first time ever that such a de-evolution of language has been recorded in this
country.) Songs and song lyrics are often simple in language and explicit in
meaning, making them easy to follow and understand. Perhaps this has always been
the case. Whether poets or musicians can influence these trends or not is yet to
be seen, though I would like to believe that using current technologies it may
be possible.
copyright
© Phillip Henry Christopher
|